What does this referral receipt confirm?
Explain what the request record shows and who can correct its route.
The question
You support appointment booking at a fictional outpatient service. A caller asks if request R17 has an appointment.
- Sender recordA transmission receipt shows 09:10. The destination detail is in the receipt log.
- Intended appointment teamNo acceptance or appointment is recorded.
The referral coordinator can correct the destination. You can report verified status and request a check.
“What can you tell the caller, and how would you get a reliable status?”
Not saved by this site. Your browser may restore text when you navigate back.
A strong answer, step by step
Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.
Step 1: What does the receipt establish?
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Treat the transport receipt as acceptance
Tempting, but it misses something. The receipt shows transmission. It does not show the intended team accepted R17.
Check destination, acknowledgement and booking separately
The strong move. Each record answers a different question about R17.
Treat the empty appointment record as a rejection
Tempting, but it misses something. There is no booking or rejection in that record.
See how a strong candidate says it
“The sender has a transmission receipt at 09:10. I’ll check its destination and the intended team’s record for acknowledgement and booking.”
Why it works: Transmission, receiving-team acknowledgement and appointment confirmation each need their own evidence.
Step 2: What can you tell the caller?
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Say the team will offer an appointment today
Tempting, but it misses something. No appointment time or offer appears in the records.
Ask the caller to submit another copy
Tempting, but it misses something. Another copy could produce two requests before you know where R17 went.
Give the receipt status and agree a time to update them
The strong move. The caller can act on a verified status and an agreed next contact.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I can see the receipt at 09:10. I don’t have a confirmed appointment. I’ll check the destination and give you the next update at the time we agree.”
Why it works: This gives the caller a verified status and a way to know what will happen next.
Step 3: Who can correct the destination?
The receipt detail shows that a shared service code sent R17 to the north scheduling inbox. The coordinator says the destination should be central intake.
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Send the discrepancy to the coordinator under R17
The strong move. This keeps the original trail and gives the correction to the owner.
Submit a fresh request to central intake
Tempting, but it misses something. A new request could leave the first one active in the other inbox.
Mark the appointment as accepted by central intake
Tempting, but it misses something. The coordinator named the destination. Central intake has not acknowledged receipt.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I’ll send the coordinator R17 and the receipt detail. I’ll ask them to correct the destination on the existing request.”
Why it works: The coordinator has authority to correct routing and check whether central intake got the request.
Step 4: What belongs in the handoff?
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Record a booking when central intake confirms receipt
Tempting, but it misses something. A receipt from the right team is still separate from a booking.
Give the ID, routing evidence, correction request and update time
The strong move. The owner can locate R17 and confirm the result of the correction.
Write “sent on” and close the request
Tempting, but it misses something. That leaves the destination, acceptance and next update unclear.
See how a strong candidate says it
“R17 was received at 09:10 by the north inbox. Please correct the route and confirm that central intake received it. The appointment remains unconfirmed. I’ll update the caller at the agreed time.”
Why it works: The owner gets the record, the discrepancy and the action. A later receipt acknowledgement only changes the receipt status.
The answer, in short
- Decision
- Verify the destination and ask the coordinator to correct the existing request.
- Because
- A transmission receipt is evidence of delivery to an inbox. Booking needs a separate confirmation.
- What would change it
- If the intended team records a booked appointment, give the verified appointment details.
Common traps
- Treating a receipt as a booked appointment
- Creating a second request before checking the first
Check your answer
- What does each record establish?
- Who can correct the route?
- When will the caller get an update?
- What stays unconfirmed after intake acknowledges receipt?
Last reviewed Nov 11, 2026